Judge rules Autopilot false advertising claims must be resolved through arbitration

A California judge has handed down a significant ruling in favour of Tesla, stating that a group of Tesla vehicle owners must resolve their claims of false advertising regarding Autopilot features through individual arbitration, rather than in a court of law.

The ruling, issued on Saturday by U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam, and reported by Reuters, revolves around a proposed class-action lawsuit filed by four Tesla owners who alleged that the company misled the public about the capabilities of its Autopilot technology. These owners claimed that Tesla repeatedly made false statements about its advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and the imminent arrival of fully self-driving vehicles.

They further asserted that they paid significant sums to purchase the optional ADAS technology when acquiring their Tesla cars between 2017 and 2022.

However, rather than experiencing the promised advancements, these Tesla owners argued that the technology had proven unreliable, resulting in accidents, injuries, and even fatalities. Tesla has consistently denied any wrongdoing and sought to have the claims handled through arbitration, referencing the arbitration agreements that the plaintiffs had accepted when purchasing their vehicles on the Tesla website.

Judge Gilliam’s decision upheld Tesla’s argument that the arbitration agreements were valid and enforceable. This ruling means that the four plaintiffs involved in this particular case will need to address their claims individually through arbitration, rather than pursuing a class-action lawsuit against the company.

This legal development comes at a crucial time, as Tesla is currently embroiled in its first US trial over allegations that its Autopilot feature contributed to a fatal accident. The trial revolves around the claim that Autopilot caused a Model 3 to veer off the road, resulting in a fatal crash. Tesla maintains that the accident was due to driver error and not a fault in the Autopilot technology.

California DMV accuses Tesla of falsely advertising FSD and Autopilot features

Previous Article

Rivian beats expectations with strong production and deliveries in Q3 2023

Next Article

Lucid offering special Air lease offer attached with Gravity order and delivery priority

You might be interested in …

Tesla Fremont factory

Tesla installing automated EINES quality control robots at Fremont factory that are already in use at their other Gigafactories

Tesla has had their fair share of complaints when it comes to build quality and quality control, most notably at their first vehicle factory in Fremont, California. Complaints of panel gaps and paint issues were […]